Initial Instruction & Scope Review | 1–3 Days
We review the opposing or existing expert report to confirm scope, jurisdictional context, and review objectives. This phase determines whether the report warrants technical critique, methodological testing, or admissibility-focused analysis.
Request for Source Material | 1–14 Days (to receive)
We identify and request underlying data relied upon by the expert, including photographs, measurements, calculations, assumptions, and reference materials. This ensures the review is based on primary sources rather than summary conclusions.
Methodology & Standards Assessment | 1–2 Weeks
The expert’s methods are assessed against accepted scientific principles, industry standards, and applicable evidentiary requirements. This phase determines whether techniques used are reliable, repeatable, and appropriate for the conclusions reached.
Assumptions & Calculations Review | 1–2 Weeks
We examine assumptions, inputs, calculations, and analytical steps for internal consistency and factual alignment. Unsupported assumptions, mathematical errors, or selective data use are identified and documented.
Evidence Consistency Analysis | 1–2 Weeks
The report is tested against physical evidence, scene data, and known facts to identify inconsistencies or omissions. This step determines whether conclusions are evidence-led or driven by interpretation beyond the available data.
Daubert / Rule 702 Reliability Review | 1–3 Weeks (if applicable)
Where admissibility is at issue, we assess the report against reliability, relevance, and methodological transparency criteria. Findings may support motions in limine, exclusion challenges, or admissibility hearings.
Consultation & Litigation Strategy | 1–2 Weeks After Review
We consult with legal teams to explain technical findings, clarify strengths and weaknesses, and assist in developing cross-examination themes or strategic responses to the expert opinion.
Peer Review Report | 1–3 Weeks After Request
A structured, objective review report is prepared, identifying methodological flaws, unsupported conclusions, or areas of agreement. Reports are suitable for litigation use, expert conferencing, or internal legal strategy.
Hearing / Trial Support | As Scheduled
We provide expert support during depositions, hearings, or trials where technical clarification or critique of the reviewed report is required. Testimony remains confined to the scope of the review and evidentiary findings.